- Mon, Oct 18Via ZoomFAES@NIH Live 2-day Workshop: Level 4 - Public Policy Series: Program Evaluation for Scientists, Engineers, and HealthProgram evaluation, often required by funders, looks at the past performance of a program to see if it has met its societal goals, how it can be improved, and whether funding for that program should be continued. This option is best for professionals and anyone currently at NIH.
- Mon, Nov 08Via ZoomFAES@NIH Live 2-day Workshop: Level 3 - Public Policy Series: Public Policy Analytical Methods for Scientists,Learn the basics of how to conduct benefit-cost analysis (BCA), cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), cost-utility analysis (CUA), and risk analysis (RA) and why are they important to program evaluation and policy analysis. This option is best for professionals and anyone currently at NIH.
- On DemandVideo Content - Office Hours via ZoomWhether you’re a scientist, engineer, or health professional interested in a career in science and technology policy or a researcher who’s interested in improving how they describe the potential societal implications of their research, you need a better understanding of science and technology policy
- On DemandVideo Content - Office Hours via ZoomPolicy analysis provides a systematic process to analyze public policy options to respond to societal challenges such as COVID-19, climate change, and homelessness. It involves identifying the underlying problem, key decision-makers, stakeholders, policy questions, and policy options.
- Access Begins Shortly After EnrollmentOn Demand Access to Class Video ContentIf you sign up for all four classes at the same time, you can earn a "Science and Technology Policy, Program Evaluation, and Analysis" certificate and other benefits. Options are available for those who took classes prior to April 1 2021. Discount of $100 if you sign up by June 15.
- On DemandVideo Content - Office Hours via ZoomLevel 3: Public Policy Analytical Methods for Decision-making: Benefit-Cost, Cost-Effectiveness, and Risk AnalysisBenefit-cost analysis (BCA), cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), and risk analysis (RA)are quantitative techniques used to support the assessment of effectiveness, efficiency and equity in the policy analysis process.
Science and Technology Policy Academy Mission
If you’re interested in science & technology policy, you’ve probably already been to any number of free webinars and panel discussions about Policy Careers, How Washington Works, How to Write a Memo, and similar topics. You also know that getting a policy fellowship or job in science & technology is very competitive.
But you are now at the stage where you need to go beyond these free options as you keep hearing the same advice over and over again. Yet, you don’t have the time or money for yet another degree or a traditional class.
If you’re a student, you can’t fit in a public policy class in an already packed schedule. And if you’re working on your dissertation, your lab chief doesn’t want you to take time off from your research to explore a non-research career option. Plus, many universities and colleges, don’t even have a public policy school where you can take classes.
And you’re concerned that even if you took this option, you’re not sure if the faculty have the practical experience you need to be more competitive than your many peers who are also interested in science & technology.
You may also lack a mentor to help you navigate the world of science & technology policy knowledge, analytical techniques, and careers. Few science & engineering faculty delve into science & technology policy, and of those who do, even fewer have learned the skills behind policy analysis or ever been in an S&T policy career.
And, if you’re currently in a job or fellowship, you may be the only scientist or engineer interested in a policy career. You’d also like to determine how best to bridge that first job or fellowship into a long-term career. The result: You find yourself needing more analysis and career guidance than your supervisors can provide.
Your goal, and that of others who are part of this community, is to provide the latest scientific and technical knowledge AND policy analysis to enhance societal outcomes in energy, the environment, health, housing, global diplomacy, innovation, and a host of other issues. The challenge is how to get there.
The Science & Technology Policy Academy (STPA) was created to meet your needs through discussions with people just like you.
Five Keys for Success
The Science and Technology Policy Academy will provide you with five keys for success:
1. Expertise: The knowledge and skills you need so you are more competitive for jobs and fellowships in science and technology policy.
2. Implementation Support: Individual vetted writing and analysis samples that you can use to apply for jobs and fellowships.
3. Community: A network of scientists, engineers, and health professionals who are also serious about a job in science & technology policy who can help each other reach their goal. You can remain part of this community even after your class ends.
4. Accountability: Through micro-assignments, weekly check-ins, group phone calls, you’ll have in place accountability measures that encourage you to take time out of your busy schedule to focus on your own success.
5. Coaching: Every class will come with a coaching call to help you better understand your career options. Ask me anything.
Founder and Chief Instructor
Hi! My name is Dr. Deborah D. Stine. For over 30 years, I've been fortunate enough to work for some of the top organizations in the country as a translator of science and technology to policy makers. I've worked at the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; the Congressional Research Service; the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology at the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy; and Carnegie Mellon University. I’ve influenced countless public policies throughout my career through my understanding of science, engineering, technology, and public policy.
I've taught and mentored hundreds of people just like you to help them go into interesting careers in science & technology policy. I was the founding director for the Christine Mirzayan Fellowship Program at the National Academies and managed it for its first ten years. I have also been on selection committees for the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) fellowship program and directly mentored interns and fellows for several years when I was at the Obama White House.
Many of the scientists, engineers, and health professionals who I’ve mentored have gone on to successful careers in the White House, Congress, federal and state agencies, non-governmental organizations, think tanks, business, and industry. Now I'd like to provide that same knowledge and guidance to you.
Based on the research I conducted with people like you, I found the chief knowledge gap to successfully landing a public policy position are analytical techniques. The first step in developing an understanding of analytical techniques is to learn how to conduct a public policy analysis. From there, you can understand how other analytical techniques like benefit-cost analysis fit into the picture of analyzing policy.
Melody Tan, PhD Candidate, Rice University
"I'm glad I took this course [Level 2] because, while I've been through many SciPol 101 workshops, I was having difficulty finding training opportunities for higher-level skills. I gained a lot from the process of developing my policy analysis question and options, and workshopping these through one-on-one calls with Debbie. I also appreciated learning about frameworks for evaluating policy, e.g., benefit cost analysis and prince analysis."
Katherine Himes, Director, McClure Center for Public Policy Research, U. of Idaho
"Thank you very much for all of your work on the Idaho Science & Technology Policy Fellowship orientation [Level 1]. We are deeply appreciative of your ability to quickly develop curriculum (with Idaho-specific examples), create online learning platforms, author daily emails (with Idaho photos), and cover so many topics in breadth and depth. You made our orientation a huge success. You brought rigorous science policy to Idaho."
Caroline Schuerger, PhD Candidate, Cleveland Clinic
"I truly learned so so much from this course [Level 2] and will definitely benefit me and my career. You're a great teacher and I appreciate you being able to approach policy teaching from the scientific perspective."
In-depth Science & Technology Policy Education and Coaching for those Serious About a Career in Science & Technology Policy